data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ef95/9ef95d0f2217a98374dc2880013e5a3e4609a32d" alt="Bluesky vs Twitter user experience comparison"
Since Elon Musk took over X (formerly Twitter), the platform has changed dramatically, and not for the better. What was once a public square for real-time conversation has become a chaotic, pay-to-play system filled with misinformation, algorithmic manipulation, and corporate control. In response, many users have started searching for an alternative, and Bluesky has emerged as the most promising contender. Unlike X, Bluesky offers a decentralized, open model that gives users control over their own experience, making it the social media network of the future.
One of the biggest differences between Bluesky and X is decentralization. Bluesky is built on the AT Protocol, which means users own their identities and can migrate between different services without losing their accounts. No single corporation has the power to dictate content rules, and developers can create their own moderation systems. In contrast, Musk’s control over X has led to unpredictable policy changes, mass suspensions, and an inconsistent approach to content moderation. On Bluesky, users aren’t at the mercy of a billionaire’s impulsive decisions.
Another major issue with X is its verification system. Under Musk, legacy verification was scrapped in favor of a system where anyone can pay for a blue check. This has led to widespread impersonation and misinformation, as credibility is now tied to payment rather than identity. Bluesky avoids this problem by linking verification to domain names, allowing users to authenticate themselves in a way that is both secure and transparent. It restores the original purpose of verification without turning it into a business model.
Algorithmic manipulation has also become a problem on X. Instead of seeing organic engagement, users are constantly pushed toward content that maximizes controversy, rewards paid subscribers, or aligns with Musk’s personal preferences. Musk has even been caught boosting his own posts above others. Bluesky takes a different approach by offering customizable feeds where users can choose what they want to see. Instead of a manipulated algorithm forcing engagement, Bluesky allows people to enjoy a real, chronological timeline without artificial amplification.
As X becomes more toxic, Bluesky is growing rapidly. While it started as an invite only platform, millions of users have already joined, including journalists, tech leaders, and former Twitter influencers. Many people who once thrived on Twitter have found a new home on Bluesky, where moderation policies are more balanced, conversations are more authentic, and the platform is free from the political chaos that has taken over X. The sense of community on Bluesky feels like what Twitter used to be a space for creativity, discussion, and real connections.
One of the most frustrating aspects of X is the rise of bots and disinformation. Russian propaganda, extremist content, and AI-generated spam have flooded the platform, often spread by paid blue check accounts that Musk refuses to regulate. Bluesky, on the other hand, has taken proactive steps to keep bot activity low and ensure that content remains real and community driven. Without a profit motive to prioritize fake engagement, the platform can maintain a healthier digital environment.
X may still be a massive social media platform, but it is declining in trust and user experience. Bluesky offers everything X once promised but failed to maintain. It is decentralized, user controlled, and free from corporate influence. There are no paywalls for identity verification, no manipulative algorithms forcing engagement, and no billionaire making arbitrary decisions about what people can and can’t say. As more users leave X, Bluesky is proving to be the true heir to Twitter’s original spirit a place for real conversations, free from chaos. The future of social media is decentralized, and Bluesky is leading the way.
Comments